From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Ahern

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 8, 2013
No. C 12-6059 SI (N.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No. C 12-6059 SI

05-08-2013

VERNON L. WALKER, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF G.J. AHERN, CAPT. K. JACKSON, LT. JAMES, DEPUTY TRACY, and DEPUTY POSEDEL, Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE

After initially failing to timely respond to defendants' motion to dismiss, pro se plaintiff Walker satisfactorily responded to the Court's order to show cause, and the Court set a new briefing schedule. See Docket Nos. 19, 22. However, plaintiff Walker also failed to meet the new briefing schedule, and the Court issued a second order to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Docket No. 26. In response, Walker explained the difficulties he has had representing himself, including the fact that he did not receive copies of all the filed documents. He has asked for a continuance of the case until after August 28, 2013, when he will be released from San Quentin State Prison, so that he may "properly research his case, retain an attorney, and appear in court out of custody."

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS plaintiff's motion for a continuance. It sets the following briefing schedule for defendants' motion to dismiss: Response Due September 27, 2013; Reply Due October 4, 2013; Hearing October 18, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Walker v. Ahern

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 8, 2013
No. C 12-6059 SI (N.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Walker v. Ahern

Case Details

Full title:VERNON L. WALKER, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF G.J. AHERN, CAPT. K. JACKSON, LT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 8, 2013

Citations

No. C 12-6059 SI (N.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)