From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker Seal Com. v. Hadfield

Court of Appeals of Virginia
May 2, 2006
Record No. 2865-05-4 (Va. Ct. App. May. 2, 2006)

Opinion

Record No. 2865-05-4.

May 2, 2006.

Appeal from the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission

(Roger L. Williams; John T. Cornett, Jr.; Williams Lynch, on briefs), for appellants.

(Peter J. Jones, on brief), for appellee.

Present: Judge McClanahan, Senior Judges Coleman and Annunziata.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.


Walker Seal Companies, Inc. and its insurer appeal a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission finding that (1) Brian R. Hadfield's (claimant) claim for his C5-6 injury was not barred by Code § 65.2-601; and (2) claimant's disability and wage loss were causally related to his compensable injury by accident. We have reviewed the record and the commission's opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Hadfield v. Walker Seal Companies, Inc. et al., VWC File No. 203-83-68 (Nov. 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Because we summarily affirm the commission's finding that claimant's claim for his C5-6 injury was included as part of his original claim and not barred by Code § 65.2-601, we need not address the additional question raised by claimant pursuant to Rule 5A:21(b) as to whether the increased herniation to C5-6 following his surgery at C6-7 was a compensable consequence of his original C6-7 injury, and therefore, constituted a change in condition governed by the limitations period contained in Code § 65.2-708.

On appeal, employer does not challenge the commission's findings that claimant's application for permanent partial disability benefits was timely filed and that claimant had reached maximum medical improvement. Accordingly, those findings are binding and conclusive upon us.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Walker Seal Com. v. Hadfield

Court of Appeals of Virginia
May 2, 2006
Record No. 2865-05-4 (Va. Ct. App. May. 2, 2006)
Case details for

Walker Seal Com. v. Hadfield

Case Details

Full title:WALKER SEAL COMPANIES, INC. AND THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY v. BRIAN R…

Court:Court of Appeals of Virginia

Date published: May 2, 2006

Citations

Record No. 2865-05-4 (Va. Ct. App. May. 2, 2006)