From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker Et. al. v. Walker

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 12, 1926
87 Pa. Super. 574 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1926)

Opinion

March 1, 1926.

March 12, 1926.

Appeals — Rules of Superior Court — Rule 57.

An appeal, which disregards almost all of the applicable rules of the Superior Court, will be dismissed upon motion of the appellee, pursuant to Rule 57.

Appeal No. 2, February T., 1926, by plaintiffs, from judgment of C.P. Lackawanna County, May T., 1918, No. 180, in the case of George Walker et al. v. Lucy Walker.

Before PORTER, P.J., HENDERSON, TREXLER, KELLER, LINN, GAWTHROP, and CUNNINGHAM, JJ. Appeal quashed.

Action of ejectment. Before NEWCOMB, J.

Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff's appeal.

Error assigned, among others, was the judgment of the court.

A.A. Vosburg, and with him Wm. B. Landis, for appellant.

James E. Watkins, and with him Reese H. Harris, of Knapp, O'Malley, Hill Harris, for appellee.


Argued March 1, 1926.


Appellee moved to quash this appeal on the ground of appellants' disregard of the rules of this court; almost all the important applicable rules have been ignored; the appeal is therefore quashed pursuant to Rule 57.

We may add that we have nevertheless considered what was submitted and find no error.

Appeal quashed.


Summaries of

Walker Et. al. v. Walker

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 12, 1926
87 Pa. Super. 574 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1926)
Case details for

Walker Et. al. v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:Walker et al., Appellants, v. Walker

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 12, 1926

Citations

87 Pa. Super. 574 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1926)