From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Waldrop v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Nov 23, 1926
110 So. 926 (Ala. Crim. App. 1926)

Opinion

5 Div. 638.

November 23, 1926.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Chilton County; Geo. F. Smoot, Judge.


The accusation against this defendant was a violation of the prohibition law. He was convicted by the jury, and was duly sentenced to perform hard labor for the county, and appealed. There was a conflict in the evidence, and the jury decided adversely to defendant. In so doing they were amply justified by the evidence. The exceptions reserved to the court's rulings upon the admission of evidence are so clearly without merit they need not be discussed. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Waldrop v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Nov 23, 1926
110 So. 926 (Ala. Crim. App. 1926)
Case details for

Waldrop v. State

Case Details

Full title:Rolie WALDROP v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Nov 23, 1926

Citations

110 So. 926 (Ala. Crim. App. 1926)
21 Ala. App. 700