Opinion
966
Decided November 21, 2002.
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Waldman v. Zion
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 21, 2002
782 N.E.2d 569 (N.Y. 2002)
Summaries of
Waldman v. Zion
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 21, 2002
782 N.E.2d 569 (N.Y. 2002)
Case details for
Waldman v. Zion
Case Details
Full title:CHAIM A. WALDMAN, C., Appellant, v. BOBOVER YESHIVA BNEI ZION, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Nov 21, 2002
Citations
782 N.E.2d 569 (N.Y. 2002)
752 N.Y.S.2d 591
99 N.Y.2d 532
Citing Cases
Waldman v. Mosdos Bobov, Inc.
The court also denied Waldman's motion to renew and reargue on December 5, 2000. The Appellate Division…