From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Waldes v. Schall

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 15, 1926
11 F.2d 453 (2d Cir. 1926)

Opinion

No. 12.

Decided January 15, 1926.

Appeal from final decree in equity entered in the District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Burnstine Geist, of New York City (Julius M. Mayer, Henry C. Burnstine, and Frederick P. Warfield, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

Avery Whiting, of New York City (Jay E. Whiting and Earl B. Barnes, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

HOUGH, MANTON and HAND, Circuit Judges.


We are entirely satisfied with the findings of fact made by the master. They dispose of the case, and decree [11 F.2d 444] is affirmed, with costs, on the master's opinion.


Summaries of

Waldes v. Schall

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 15, 1926
11 F.2d 453 (2d Cir. 1926)
Case details for

Waldes v. Schall

Case Details

Full title:Jindrich WALDES, Ignatz Puc, Edward Merzinger and Sigmund Waldes…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Jan 15, 1926

Citations

11 F.2d 453 (2d Cir. 1926)

Citing Cases

Waldes v. Schall

In Equity. Suit for accounting by Jindrich Waldes and others, copartners doing business under the firm name…

Standard Oil Co. v. Markham

It is well settled that genuine transfers of property, made in contemplation of war and for the specific…