Walden v. Walden

Full title: Jonathan A. WALDEN, Petitioner, v. Elizabeth A. WALDEN, Respondent.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Mar 9, 2015

157 So. 3d 1100 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 1D14–3972.

03-09-2015

Jonathan A. WALDEN, Petitioner, v. Elizabeth A. WALDEN, Respondent.

Stefani K. Nolan and Shachar D. Spiegel of Kenny Leigh & Associates, P.A., Jacksonville; and Brian P. North, Mary Esther, for Petitioner. Christopher M. Taylor, Jacksonville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Stefani K. Nolan and Shachar D. Spiegel of Kenny Leigh & Associates, P.A., Jacksonville; and Brian P. North, Mary Esther, for Petitioner.

Christopher M. Taylor, Jacksonville, for Respondent.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Welden, 483 So.2d 487, 489 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (“[W]here the moving party's allegations raise a colorable entitlement to rule 1.540(b)(3) relief, a formal evidentiary hearing on the motion, as well as permissible discovery prior to the hearing, is required.”).

ROWE, RAY and BILBREY, JJ., concur.