Opinion
3:14-cv-00320-MMD-WGC
01-03-2022
DONALD WALDEN, JR., et al., etc., Plaintiffs, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, EX REL. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, and DOES 1-50, Defendants.
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP Sheri M. Thome, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 008657 Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 Attorneys for Defendant THIERMAN BUCK LLP Mark R. Thierman, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8285 Joshua D. Buck, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12187 Leah L. Jones, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13161 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
Sheri M. Thome, Esq.,
Nevada Bar No. 008657
Las Vegas, Nevada 89119
Attorneys for Defendant
THIERMAN BUCK LLP
Mark R. Thierman, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8285
Joshua D. Buck, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12187
Leah L. Jones, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13161
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR FILING REPLY BRIEFS
(FIRST REQUEST)
MIRANDA M. DU, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Defendant the State of Nevada, ex rel. its Nevada Department of Corrections (“NDOC”) and and Plaintiffs Donald Walden Jr., Nathan Echeverria, Aaron Dicus, Brent Everist, Travis Zufelt, Timothy Ridenour, and Daniel Tracy, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for filing the reply briefs to the following from January 7, 2022, to January 17, 2022:
1. NDOC's Motion to Decertify Collective Action (ECF 343);
2. Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Liability for Unpaid Wages Under the FLSA (ECF 346);
3. Plaintiffs' Motion to Reassert Claim for Failure to Pay Overtime in Violation of NRS 284.180 and Memorandum in Support Thereof (ECF 350);
4. NDOC's Motion to Exclude All Evidence from Plaintiffs' Experts (ECF 351);
5. NDOC's Motion to Dismiss Claims of Nonparticipating Plaintiffs (ECF 354);
6. NDOC's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 355).
This stipulation is submitted in compliance with LR IA 6-1. Good cause exists for the requested extension as the parties need additional time to prepare replies due to the holidays. Accordingly, the parties agree that the requested extension furthers the interest of this litigation and is not being requested in bad faith or to delay these proceedings unnecessarily.
This is the parties' first request for extension of these deadlines.
ORDER
GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.