Opinion
3:14-cv-00320-MMD-WGC
08-04-2022
DONALD WALDEN, JR., et al., etc., Plaintiffs, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, EX REL. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, and DOES 1-50, Defendants.
WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER LLP Sheri M. Thome Sheri M. Thome, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants The State of Nevada, ex rel. its Department of Corrections THIERMAN BUCK LLP Joshua D. Buck Mark R. Thierman, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8285 Joshua D. Buck, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12187 Leah L. Jones, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13161 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ
EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
Sheri M. Thome
Sheri M. Thome, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendants The State of Nevada, ex rel. its Department of Corrections
THIERMAN BUCK LLP
Joshua D. Buck
Mark R. Thierman, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8285
Joshua D. Buck, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 12187
Leah L. Jones, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 13161
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Defendant the State of Nevada, ex rel. its Nevada Department of Corrections (“NDOC”) and and Plaintiffs Donald Walden Jr., Nathan Echeverria, Aaron Dicus, Brent Everist, Travis Zufelt, Timothy Ridenour, and Daniel Tracy, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to continue the video hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (“Motion”) until after the In-Person Settlement Conference is held.
1. The video hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion is scheduled for August 8, 2022 at 9:00 a.m.
2. The in-person settlement conference is scheduled for September 15, 2022 at 9:00 a.m.
3. The parties request that the video hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion be continued to a date on or after September 19, 2022.
This stipulation is submitted in compliance with LR IA 6-1. Good cause exists for the requested continuance as the parties would like to await the outcome of the settlement conference in order to determine whether a hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion is still necessary. Additionally, the parties believe that the settlement conference will be more productive if the hearing occurs after the settlement conference. Accordingly, the parties agree that the requested continuance furthers the interest of this litigation and is not being requested in bad faith or to delay these proceedings unnecessarily.
This is the parties' first request for continuance of the hearing date on Plaintiffs' Motion.
ORDER
GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED. The hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint shall be continued from August 8, 2022 at 9:00 a.m. to ________ Thursday, September 22, , 2022, at 9:00 a.m.