From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wald v. Wald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 1979
70 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

June 18, 1979


In a matrimonial action, the parties cross-appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 25, 1978, which dismissed plaintiff's amended complaint and granted defendant alimony in the sum of $375 per week, exclusive possession of the marital home and counsel fees and disbursements in the sum of $20,643.25. Judgment modified, on the facts, by (1) increasing the alimony award to $450 per week and (2) decreasing the counsel fees award to $11,000 plus disbursements. As so modified, judgment affirmed, with costs to the defendant. Plaintiff husband failed to supply the proof required for a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. In a marriage of this duration (31 years), plaintiff must show more than disharmony and quarreling (see Hessen v Hessen, 33 N.Y.2d 406; Knox v. Knox, 70 A.D.2d 652; Filippi v Filippi, 53 A.D.2d 658). The preseparation standard of living, which included extensive redecorating, generous gifts and travel, warrants a larger support award for the defendant. Although an award of counsel fees was proper the amount awarded was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Hopkins, J.P., Damiani, Titone and Mangano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wald v. Wald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 1979
70 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Wald v. Wald

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS WALD, Appellant-Respondent, v. SYLVIA WALD, Respondent-Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1979

Citations

70 A.D.2d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

Wald v. Wald

Therefore, Special Term properly permitted entry of the interlocutory judgment of divorce. In action No. 1…

Brady v. Brady

In Hessen, we also noted that the determination of whether conduct constituted cruel and inhuman treatment…