From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walcutt v. Huling

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 1, 1915
92 Ohio St. 518 (Ohio 1915)

Opinion

No. 14299.

January Term, 1915.

ERROR to Court of Appeals of Franklin county.

Mr. C.M. Addison, for Plaintiff in error.

Mr. J.E. Todd; Mr. C.P. Outhwaite; Mr. Jos. H. Dyer; Mr. Stuart R. Bolin and Mr. Geo. D. Jones, for defendants in error.


Judgment Affirmed. NICHOLS, C.J., JOHNSON, DONAHUE, NEWMAN and MATTHIAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Walcutt v. Huling

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 1, 1915
92 Ohio St. 518 (Ohio 1915)
Case details for

Walcutt v. Huling

Case Details

Full title:WALCUTT v. HULING ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jan 1, 1915

Citations

92 Ohio St. 518 (Ohio 1915)

Citing Cases

Software v. Infocon Systems, Inc.

An attorney's charging lien "is an equitable right to be paid for his services out of the proceeds of the…

Slater v. Ohio Dep't of Rehab. & Corr.

The lien of an attorney upon a judgment is an equitable lien, and is upheld simply upon the theory that his…