From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walbridge v. Northern Hydraulics

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Mar 17, 2005
693 N.W.2d 425 (Minn. 2005)

Opinion

No. A04-2232.

March 17, 2005.

John J. Horvei, New Brighton, MN, for Employee-Relator.

Jay T. Hartman, Tracy M. Borash, Heacox, Hartman, Mattaini, Koshmrl, Cosgriff Johnson, P.A., St. Paul, MN, for Employer Insurer-Respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc.


ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed October 22, 2004, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice


Summaries of

Walbridge v. Northern Hydraulics

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Mar 17, 2005
693 N.W.2d 425 (Minn. 2005)
Case details for

Walbridge v. Northern Hydraulics

Case Details

Full title:Gerilynn L. WALBRIDGE, Relator, v. NORTHERN HYDRAULICS, and Compcost…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Mar 17, 2005

Citations

693 N.W.2d 425 (Minn. 2005)