From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wakeman v. Coleman

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1865
28 Cal. 58 (Cal. 1865)

Opinion

         Appeal from the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco.

         The transcript in this case contained a copy of the pleadings, findings of fact of the Court below, and its conclusions of law, the notice of motion for new trial, statement, order denying a new trial, and notice of appeal. Defendants recovered judgment in the Court below, and plaintiffs appealed.

         COUNSEL:

         Shafter & Goold, for Appellants.

          G. F. & W. H. Sharp, for Respondents.


         JUDGES: Sawyer, J.

         OPINION

          SAWYER, Judge

         Respondents move to dismiss the appeal on the following grounds: Firstly. The transcript does not contain a copy of the judgment. The appeal is not from the judgment, but from the order denying a new trial. On appeal from an order it is only required that the " appellant shall furnish the Court with a copy of the notice of appeal, * * * order appealed from, and a copy of the papers used on the hearing in the Court below." (Pr. Act, Sec. 346.) These papers are contained in the transcript. Secondly. It does not appear in the transcript that any undertaking has ever been filed. " As no appeal is effectual for any purpose without an undertaking, the appellant must show affirmatively that the required undertaking has been given." (Bryan v. Berry , 8 Cal. 134; Franklin v. Reiner, Id. 340.) The fact may be shown either by introducing a copy of the undertaking into the transcript, or by stating in the transcript that an undertaking in due form was filed within the time prescribed. (Id.)

         The appellant suggested a diminution of the record in this respect, and by way of counter motion asked an order directing the Clerk of the District Court to certify a copy of the undertaking on file to this Court, and since the submission of the motion to dismiss, the appellant has transmitted to this Court a certified copy of an undertaking on appeal in due form.

         We think the appellant should be permitted to supply the defect in the record.

         Ordered, that the certified copy of the undertaking on appeal transmitted to this Court be filed by the Clerk, and that the motion to dismiss be denied, and that respondents recover the costs of their motion.


Summaries of

Wakeman v. Coleman

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 1865
28 Cal. 58 (Cal. 1865)
Case details for

Wakeman v. Coleman

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM W. WAKEMAN, WARREN D. GOOKEN, CHARLES DIMON and JOHN B. DICKINSON…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Apr 1, 1865

Citations

28 Cal. 58 (Cal. 1865)

Citing Cases

San Francisco & North Pacific Railroad Co. v. Anderson

It has been held by this court that it was sufficient to set out the undertaking in the transcript, and…

Pacific Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Edgar

The language of the code is unambiguous, and it has been held that the transcript must show that an…