From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Waidla v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 19, 2017
Case No.: CV 01-0650 AG (C.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2017)

Opinion

Case No.: CV 01-0650 AG

12-19-2017

TAUNO WAIDLA, Petitioner, v. RON DAVIS, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin, Respondent


JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREEED that the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed on March 17, 2006 is GRANTED IN PART as follows:

Under 28 U.S.C. section 2254(d), Petitioner's claim of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel regarding the penalty phase of his trial is GRANTED. All other claims for relief are DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 120 days of the date of this order, the State of California shall either commence retrial of the penalty phase of Petitioner's case or convert his sentence to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 19, 2017

/s/_________

ANDREW GUILFORD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Waidla v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 19, 2017
Case No.: CV 01-0650 AG (C.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2017)
Case details for

Waidla v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:TAUNO WAIDLA, Petitioner, v. RON DAVIS, Warden, California State Prison at…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 19, 2017

Citations

Case No.: CV 01-0650 AG (C.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2017)