From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wahiid Mujaheed Alamiin v. Miller

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jan 6, 2010
Case No. CIV-08-1371-F (W.D. Okla. Jan. 6, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-08-1371-F.

January 6, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff, a prisoner appearing pro se, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and § 2000cc, alleging violation of his constitutional rights and his rights under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). The November 20, 2009 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Doyle W. Argo (doc. no. 51) recommends that plaintiff's claims against defendant Leo Brown be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m), Fed.R.Civ.P. The Report advises that any objection to the Report must be filed by December 10, 2009, and states that failure to make timely objection to the Report waives the right to appellate review of both factual and legal questions contained in the Report. No objection to the Report has been filed, and no request for an extension of time within to file such an objection has been sought.

Having reviewed the matter, and with there being no objection, the court finds that it agrees with the Report. It further finds that no purpose would be served by stating any further analysis here.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Argo is ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and AFFIRMED in its entirety. Plaintiff's claims against defendant Leo Brown are DISMISSED without prejudice under Rule 4(m). This action remains referred.


Summaries of

Wahiid Mujaheed Alamiin v. Miller

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jan 6, 2010
Case No. CIV-08-1371-F (W.D. Okla. Jan. 6, 2010)
Case details for

Wahiid Mujaheed Alamiin v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:WAHIID MUJAHEED ALAMIIN, Plaintiff, v. DAVID MILLER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 6, 2010

Citations

Case No. CIV-08-1371-F (W.D. Okla. Jan. 6, 2010)

Citing Cases

Jernigan v. Martinez

This principle has been affirmed in several cases brought by Muslim and Jewish prisoners. See Alamiin v.…

Jernigan v. Martinez

her Plaintiff's right to exercise his religion was substantially burdened by Defendants' refusal to provide…