Opinion
Civil Action 22-3776 (UNA)
01-26-2023
MICHAEL L. WAGNER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES SOLICITOR GENERAL, Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff, appearing pro se, has filed a Complaint for Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights, ECF No. 1, and an application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2. The Court will grant the application and dismiss this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (requiring immediate dismissal of a case upon a determination that the complaint is frivolous).
Plaintiff, a resident of Redwood City, California, invokes 42 U.S.C. § 1985, which creates a private cause of action for damages where “two or more persons” conspire to interfere with a person's civil rights through statutorily proscribed conduct. But his one-page complaint names the U.S. Solicitor General, who cannot conspire alone, and is otherwise a collection of nonsensical words. Therefore, this case will be dismissed by separate order. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989) (complaints premised on fantastic or delusional scenarios or supported wholly by allegations lacking “an arguable basis either in law or in fact” may be dismissed as frivolous).