From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wagner v. State

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Feb 8, 2018
Appellate case number: 01-17-00752-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 8, 2018)

Opinion

Appellate case number: 01-17-00752-CR

02-08-2018

David Anthony Wagner v. The State of Texas


ORDER OF ABATEMENT Trial court case number: B-16-0323-SA Trial court: 119th District Court of Tom Green County

On August 17, 2017, appellant, David Anthony Wagner, was convicted after the trial court revoked his community supervision, adjudicated him guilty of the third-degree felony offense of possession of a controlled substance, namely, methamphetamine. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.115(c) (West 2017). The trial court assessed appellant's punishment at seven years' confinement and ordered him to pay a $2,500.00 fine and $180.00 in restitution. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 12.34 (West 2017). Also on August 17, 2017, the trial court certified that this was not a plea-bargain case, and that appellant had the right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On September 6, 2017, appellant's trial counsel timely filed a notice of appeal, motion for new trial, and motion to withdraw. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). On September 8, 2017, the trial court granted appellant's trial counsel's motion to withdraw, found appellant indigent for purposes of appeal, and appointed Connie J. Kelley as his appellate attorney. On September 28, 2017, the Texas Supreme Court transferred this appeal from the Third Court of Appeals to this Court pursuant to its docket equalization powers. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2017).

The complete record was filed in the above-referenced appeal on December 15, 2017, with the filing of the clerk's record, and appellant's brief was due by January 16, 2018. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a), 38.6(a). Because appellant did not timely file a brief, the Clerk of this Court's January 25, 2018 late-brief notice notified appellant's appointed counsel, Connie J. Kelley, that this case may be abated for a hearing pursuant to Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(2), if either the brief or an extension motion were not filed within ten days of that notice. Appellant's counsel failed to timely respond.

Accordingly, we sua sponte abate this appeal and remand for the trial court to immediately conduct a hearing at which a representative of the Tom Green County District Attorney's Office and appellant's counsel, Connie J. Kelley, shall be present. TEX. R. APP. 38.8(b)(2). Appellant shall also be present for the hearing in person or, if appellant is incarcerated, at the trial court's discretion, appellant may participate in the hearing by closed-circuit video teleconferencing.

Any such teleconference must use a closed-circuit video teleconferencing system that provides for a simultaneous compressed full motion video and interactive communication of image and sound between the trial court, appellant, and any attorneys representing the State or appellant. On request of appellant, appellant and his counsel shall be able to communicate privately without being recorded or heard by the trial court or the attorney representing the State.

The trial court shall have a court reporter record the hearing. The trial court is directed to:

(1) make a finding on whether appellant wishes to prosecute this appeal;
(2) if appellant does wish to prosecute this appeal, determine whether counsel Connie J. Kelley has abandoned this appeal;
(3) if counsel Connie J. Kelley has not abandoned this appeal:
a. inquire of counsel the reasons, if any, that she has failed to file a brief timely on appellant's behalf; and
b. set a date certain when appellant's brief will be due, regardless of whether this Court has yet reinstated this appeal and no later than 30 days from the date of the hearing;
(4) if Connie J. Kelley has abandoned this appeal, enter a written order relieving Connie J. Kelley of her duties as appellant's counsel, including in the order the basis for the finding of abandonment, determine whether appellant is indigent, and:
a. if appellant is still indigent, appoint substitute appellate counsel at no expense to appellant;
b. if appellant is not indigent, admonish appellant of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation, and:
i. determine whether appellant is knowingly and intelligently waiving his right to counsel and, if so, obtain a written waiver of the right to counsel and set a date certain when appellant's brief is due, regardless of whether this Court has yet reinstated these appeals and no later than 30 days from the date of the hearing; or,
ii. if appellant does not wish to proceed pro se, provide a deadline by which appellant must hire an attorney;
(5) make any other findings and recommendations the trial court deems appropriate; and
(6) enter written findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations as to these issues, separate and apart from any docket sheet notations.
See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 1.051(a), (d)(1), (f) (West 2017); TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b); Gonzalez v. State, 117 S.W.3d 831, 837 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (stating that presumption in favor of right to choice of counsel may be overridden by other factors relating to fair and orderly administration of justice); cf. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 1.051(g) (requiring trial court to advise defendant of dangers and disadvantages of self-representation prior to proceeding to trial), 26.04(j)(2) (authorizing trial court to order appointed counsel to withdraw after finding of good cause is entered on record).

The court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date no later than 30 days from the date of this order and notify the parties and the Clerk of this Court of such date. The trial court clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk's record containing the trial court's findings and recommendations with this Court within 10 days of the date of the hearing. The court reporter is directed to file the reporter's record of the hearing within 10 days of the date of the hearing. If the hearing is conducted by video teleconference, a certified video recording of the hearing shall also be filed in this Court within 10 days of the date of this hearing.

If Connie J. Kelley files an extension motion and brief on appellant's behalf in this Court and a copy of such brief in the trial court, and her brief complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1, no later than 10 days from the date of this order, together with a motion requesting that we withdraw this Order of Abatement, this Court may reconsider and withdraw this order and reinstate the appeal.

This appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court's active docket. This appeal will be reinstated on this Court's active docket when the supplemental clerk's record and the reporter's record are filed in this Court.

It is so ORDERED. Judge's signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

[v] Acting individually [ ] Acting for the Court Date: February 8, 2018


Summaries of

Wagner v. State

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Feb 8, 2018
Appellate case number: 01-17-00752-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 8, 2018)
Case details for

Wagner v. State

Case Details

Full title:David Anthony Wagner v. The State of Texas

Court:COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Date published: Feb 8, 2018

Citations

Appellate case number: 01-17-00752-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 8, 2018)