From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wagner v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jul 30, 2010
CASE NO. 1:09cv1115 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 30, 2010)

Summary

finding that conflicts between the DOT and VE testimony involving occasional stooping and frequent stooping and intellectual ability did not require remand because plaintiff's counsel did not bring the conflicts to the ALJ's attention and the ALJ was not required to conduct his or her own investigation of the VE testimony.

Summary of this case from Cross v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:09cv1115.

July 30, 2010


ORDER


Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation ("R R") of a magistrate judge recommending that this case be remanded for a rehearing under the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) primarily because the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ"), applying the wrong legal standard, conducted a redetermination rather than a continuing disability review. (Doc. No. 16.) Objections to the R R were due on July 29, 2010. The Commissioner filed a notice that he would not be filing any objections. (Doc. No. 17.) Not surprisingly, plaintiff has not filed any objections.

There being no objections to the R R, the Court hereby ACCEPTS the R R and will by separate Judgment Entry remand this matter for a rehearing before an ALJ. The rehearing should be a continuing disability review.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wagner v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jul 30, 2010
CASE NO. 1:09cv1115 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 30, 2010)

finding that conflicts between the DOT and VE testimony involving occasional stooping and frequent stooping and intellectual ability did not require remand because plaintiff's counsel did not bring the conflicts to the ALJ's attention and the ALJ was not required to conduct his or her own investigation of the VE testimony.

Summary of this case from Cross v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
Case details for

Wagner v. Commissioner of Social Security

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTINA M. WAGNER, PLAINTIFF, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jul 30, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 1:09cv1115 (N.D. Ohio Jul. 30, 2010)

Citing Cases

Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security

Redeterminations were one of the major realignments of Social Security law under Public Law 104-193, commonly…

Cross v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

0-4p inquiry."); Kuhn v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., No. 3:12 CV 654, 2013 WL 3190697, at *17 (N.D. Ohio June 21,…