Summary
remanding to trial court to determine whether the unexplained procedure of "dressing-out" a detainee, known to be in need of psychiatric treatment, from civilian clothes to jail garb, which included wearing pink underwear, was punishment without legal justification when detainee believed he was being raped and humiliated
Summary of this case from Davis v. SuhrOpinion
No. 10–15501.
2012-11-16
Yvon WAGNER, as the personal representative of the Estate of Eric Vogel, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. COUNTY OF MARICOPA, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona; Joseph M. Arpaio, husband; Unknown Arpaio, Named as Jane Doe Arpaio-wife, Defendants–Appellees.
Editor's Note: The opinion of the United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, in Wagner v. County of Maricopa, published in the advance sheet at this citation, 701 F.3d 583, was withdrawn from the bound volume because it was amended and superseded February 13, 2013. For superseding opinion, see 2013 WL 541289.