From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wagiu v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 4, 2008
299 F. App'x 686 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 05-76518.

Submitted October 28, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed November 4, 2008.

Kathleen S. Koh, Law Offices of Kathleen S. Koh, Alhambra, CA, for Petitioners.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Allen W. Hausman, Attorney Fax, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency Nos. A095-630-213 to A095-630-215.

Before: HAWKINS, RAWLINSON, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Siegfried Wagiu and his two children, natives and citizens of Indonesia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge's decision denying their application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.

We review for substantial evidence, Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir. 2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA denied Wagiu's asylum application as time barred. Wagiu does not challenge this finding.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA's denial of withholding of removal because Wagiu's experiences in Indonesia did not constitute past persecution. See id. at 1016-18. Furthermore, even if the disfavored group analysis set forth in Sael v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 922, 927-29 (9th Cir. 2004) applies to Christian Indonesians seeking withholding of removal, Wagiu failed to establish that it was more likely than not that he will be persecuted on account of his religion if he returned to Indonesia. See Hoxha v. Ashcroft, 319 F.3d 1179, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2003). Substantial evidence also supports the BIA's denial of withholding of removal because Wagiu could relocate to another part of the country. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(b)(3).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.


Summaries of

Wagiu v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 4, 2008
299 F. App'x 686 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Wagiu v. Mukasey

Case Details

Full title:Siegfried WAGIU; et al., Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 4, 2008

Citations

299 F. App'x 686 (9th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Wagiu v. Holder

See Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 990. In light of our decision in Wagiu v. Mukasey, 299 Fed.Appx. 686 (9th Cir.…