From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Waggoner v. State

United States District Court, D. Oregon
May 3, 2007
06-467-SU (D. Or. May. 3, 2007)

Opinion

06-467-SU.

May 3, 2007

TIMOTHY P. DUNN, Timothy Dunn, Attorney at Law, Aloha, OR, Attorney for Plaintiff.

HARDY MYERS, Attorney General, LYNNE D. RENNICK, Special Assistant Attorney General for the State of Oregon, Sutherlin, OR, Attorneys for Defendants.


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan issued Findings and Recommendation (#16) on April 11, 2007, in which she recommended this Court grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (#11) and dismiss this matter without prejudice. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). See also Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings and Recommendation (#16). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (#11) and DISMISSES this matter without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Waggoner v. State

United States District Court, D. Oregon
May 3, 2007
06-467-SU (D. Or. May. 3, 2007)
Case details for

Waggoner v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY WAGGONER, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OREGON; MAX WILLIAMS, Director…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: May 3, 2007

Citations

06-467-SU (D. Or. May. 3, 2007)