From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wadley v. Dauphin Cnty. Prob. & Parole

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 14, 2012
No. 3:12-cv-1096 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 14, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:12-cv-1096

08-14-2012

JUSTIN WADLEY, Plaintiff, v. DAUPHIN COUNTY PROBATION & PAROLE, Defendant.


(JUDGE CAPUTO)


(MAGISTRATE JUDGE BLEWITT)


ORDER

NOW this 14th day of August, 2012, upon review of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Thomas M. Blewitt (Doc. 6) for plain error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 6) is ADOPTED;
(2) The Clerk of Court is directed to docket Plaintiff's present case as a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254;
(3) Plaintiffs claim for monetary damages are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to be re-filed in a separate § 1983 action; and
(4) This matter is RECOMMITTED to Magistrate Judge Blewitt for further proceedings.

_________________

A. Richard Caputo

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Wadley v. Dauphin Cnty. Prob. & Parole

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 14, 2012
No. 3:12-cv-1096 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Wadley v. Dauphin Cnty. Prob. & Parole

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN WADLEY, Plaintiff, v. DAUPHIN COUNTY PROBATION & PAROLE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 14, 2012

Citations

No. 3:12-cv-1096 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 14, 2012)