Wade v. Wichita Cnty.

Full title: MICKY DAWN WADE, Petitioner, v. WICHITA COUNTY, TEXAS, Respondent.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

Date published: Sep 2, 2020

Civil Action No. 7:19-cv-070-O-BP (N.D. Tex. Sep. 2, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:19-cv-070-O-BP

09-02-2020

MICKY DAWN WADE, Petitioner, v. WICHITA COUNTY, TEXAS, Respondent.

Reed O'Connor UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This is a habeas action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The United States Magistrate Judge entered his Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation in which he recommends that the petition be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies. See ECF No. 12. Petitioner has filed objections. See ECF No. 13.

The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation to which objections were made and reviewed the remaining Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, I am of the opinion that the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and reasons for denial set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation are correct and they are hereby adopted and incorporated by reference as the Findings of the Court.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies.

SO ORDERED this 2nd day of September, 2020.

/s/ _________

Reed O'Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE