Wade v. Wade

Full title: BEVAN J. WADE, Appellant, v. JONATHAN PAUL WADE, Appellee.

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Sep 20, 2017

CASE NO. 1D17-0341 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Sep. 20, 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1D17-0341

09-20-2017

BEVAN J. WADE, Appellant, v. JONATHAN PAUL WADE, Appellee.

Bevan J. Wade, pro se, Appellant. Jonathan Paul Wade, pro se, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.
David Rimmer, Judge. Bevan J. Wade, pro se, Appellant. Jonathan Paul Wade, pro se, Appellee. PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from a final judgment of dissolution, we affirm without comment as to all issues except the requirement that the former husband maintain life insurance to secure his support obligations. The trial court orally pronounced this requirement, but it was not included in the written judgment as the law requires. See Schmidt v. Schmidt, 151 So. 3d 27, 28 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (holding written judgment must conform to oral pronouncement). Therefore, we reverse and remand for the trial court to modify the final judgment to include the orally-pronounced life insurance requirement.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with instructions. RAY, BILBREY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.