From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wade v. Tampkins

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Aug 17, 2015
EDCV 13-2184 DMG(JC) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2015)

Opinion

          William E Wade, Petitioner, Pro se, San Luis Obispo, CA.

          For Cynthia Tampkins, Respondent: David Delgado-Rucci, CAAG - Office of the Attorney General, California Department of Justice, San Diego, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (the " Petition"), the filings and records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (" Report and Recommendation"). The Court approves and accepts the Report and Recommendation.

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Report and Recommendation, and the Judgment herein on petitioner and counsel for respondent.

         LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

         JUDGMENT

         Pursuant to this Court's Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Wade v. Tampkins

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Aug 17, 2015
EDCV 13-2184 DMG(JC) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2015)
Case details for

Wade v. Tampkins

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM E. WADE, Petitioner, v. CYNTHIA TAMPKINS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Aug 17, 2015

Citations

EDCV 13-2184 DMG(JC) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2015)