From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wade v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Jan 16, 2001
36 S.W.3d 406 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 77176

January 16, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS HONORABLE JOHN J. RILEY.

Gwenda R. Robinson; Assistant Public Defender; St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon; Attorney General; Gregory L. Barnes; Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before: MARY K. HOFF, C.J., KATHIANNE K. CRANE, J., and ROBERT E. CRIST, Sr. J.



Unzell Wade ("Movant") appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion to vacate, set aside or correct his judgment and sentence without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Wade v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Jan 16, 2001
36 S.W.3d 406 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Wade v. State

Case Details

Full title:UNZELL WADE, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five

Date published: Jan 16, 2001

Citations

36 S.W.3d 406 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)