From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wade v. Rohrbough

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Oct 1, 2021
No. CIV-21-00101-PRW (W.D. Okla. Oct. 1, 2021)

Opinion

CIV-21-00101-PRW

10-01-2021

TIMOTHY WILLIS WADE, Plaintiff, v. BARRY ROHRBOUGH, et. al., Defendants.


ORDER

PATRICK R. WYRICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, appearing pro se, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and sought to proceed in forma pauperis. On June 22, 2021, United States Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell issued a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 19) recommending Plaintiffs action be dismissed without prejudice based on his failure to comply with the Court's Orders and/or keep the Court apprised of his current contact information. The Court has attempted to provide Plaintiff sufficient notice of the possibility of dismissal and gave him an additional response opportunity through objection to the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 19) by no later than July 12, 2021. To date, Plaintiff has filed no objections. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wade v. Rohrbough

United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma
Oct 1, 2021
No. CIV-21-00101-PRW (W.D. Okla. Oct. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Wade v. Rohrbough

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY WILLIS WADE, Plaintiff, v. BARRY ROHRBOUGH, et. al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 1, 2021

Citations

No. CIV-21-00101-PRW (W.D. Okla. Oct. 1, 2021)