From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wade v. Quintana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 27, 2021
Case No. 5:18-cv-02681-FLA (KKx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 5:18-cv-02681-FLA (KKx)

02-27-2021

BOBBY WADE, Plaintiff, v. FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, ET AL., Defendant(s).


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

It is therefore ORDERED that 1) Defendant United States of America's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED; and 2) the Individual Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED. Accordingly, all claims in the SAC against Defendants Brigitte Wolverton, Liza Hoen, Edward Perez, Rachael Academia, Carmen Herrera, and David Dittemore are dismissed without prejudice. Dated: February 27, 2021

/s/_________

FERNANDO L. AENLLE-ROCHA

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Wade v. Quintana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 27, 2021
Case No. 5:18-cv-02681-FLA (KKx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Wade v. Quintana

Case Details

Full title:BOBBY WADE, Plaintiff, v. FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, ET AL., Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 27, 2021

Citations

Case No. 5:18-cv-02681-FLA (KKx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2021)