From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wade v. Quintana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Nov 9, 2020
CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:19-CV-438-P (W.D. La. Nov. 9, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:19-CV-438-P

11-09-2020

BOBBY WADE, Plaintiff v. FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, ET AL., Defendants


MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein (ECF No. 49), and after a de novo review of the record, including the Objection filed by Plaintiff (ECF No. 52), having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 48) is hereby DENIED.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, at Alexandria, Louisiana, on this 9th day of November, 2020.

/s/_________

DEE D. DRELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wade v. Quintana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Nov 9, 2020
CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:19-CV-438-P (W.D. La. Nov. 9, 2020)
Case details for

Wade v. Quintana

Case Details

Full title:BOBBY WADE, Plaintiff v. FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, ET AL., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Nov 9, 2020

Citations

CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:19-CV-438-P (W.D. La. Nov. 9, 2020)