From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wade v. Day

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Feb 15, 1916
162 P. 454 (Okla. 1916)

Opinion

No. 6074

Opinion Filed February 15, 1916.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Briefs — Rules of Court — Reversal. Where plaintiff in error has filed proper brief sustaining his assignment of error and defendant in error has neither filed a brief nor offered any excuse for such failure, the court is not required to search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment of the trial court may be sustained, but may reverse the judgment in accordance with the prayer of the petition in error.

(Syllabus by Watts, C.)

Error from District Court, Nowata County; T.L. Brown, Judge.

Action by Harvey E. Wade against Lena Day. Judment for defendant. Reversed.

Floyd A. Calvert and Chase Campbell, for plaintiff in error.


This case comes from the district court of Nowata county, where the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, sued the defendant in error, defendant below. From a judgment rendered on the 6th day of September, 1913, in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals. The record was filed in this court on the 20th day of February, 1914. Plaintiff in error filed briefs September 1, 1915. The defendant in error having failed to file brief and not having sought extension of time in which to file same, the case now being ready for consideration by this court, and the contentions contained in plaintiff in error's brief appearing to be reasonably well taken, the judgment will be reversed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Wade v. Day

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Feb 15, 1916
162 P. 454 (Okla. 1916)
Case details for

Wade v. Day

Case Details

Full title:WADE v. DAY

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Feb 15, 1916

Citations

162 P. 454 (Okla. 1916)
162 P. 454

Citing Cases

Central Nat. Oil Co. v. Continental Supply Co.

This interest charge was illegal on the face of the petition and exhibit. Comp. Stat. 1921, sections 5097 and…