From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wade v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 19, 2013
Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-0135-AP (D. Colo. Apr. 19, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-0135-AP

04-19-2013

Vicki Wade, Plaintiff, v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

Ruth K. Irvin Ruth K. Irvin, #10326 Irvin & Irvin Attorney for Plaintiff Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley By: Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration Attorneys for Defendant


JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff:

Ruth K. Irvin
Irvin & Irvin
595 Canyon Boulevard
Boulder, CO 80302
303-543-0337
rkirvin@irvinlaw.net

For Defendant:

Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1001 Seventeenth Street
Denver, CO 80202
303-844-0815
Stephanie.kiley@ssa.gov
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
J.B. Garcia
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: January 22, 2013
B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: January 30, 2013
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: April 1, 2013

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and accurate.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

Neither party intends to submit additional evidence.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe the case raises unusual claims or defenses.

7. OTHER MATTERS

The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: June 12, 2013
B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: July 12, 2013
C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: July 29, 2013

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Indicate below the parties' consent choice.


A. () All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
B. (x) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

BY THE COURT:

John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED: Ruth K. Irvin
Ruth K. Irvin, #10326
Irvin & Irvin
Attorney for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
By: Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
Attorneys for Defendant


Summaries of

Wade v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 19, 2013
Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-0135-AP (D. Colo. Apr. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Wade v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:Vicki Wade, Plaintiff, v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 19, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-0135-AP (D. Colo. Apr. 19, 2013)