From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

W. Klang Son v. Milar Galleries

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 1, 1976
328 So. 2d 510 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

No. 75-1518.

February 24, 1976. Rehearing Denied April 1, 1976.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, John V. Ferguson, J.

Norman F. Solomon, Miami, for appellant.

Nat Gursten, North Miami, Batchelor, Brodnax, Guthrie Kindred, Miami, for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.


This interlocutory appeal involves the propriety of an order denying a motion to intervene. Milar Galleries, Inc., a retail jewelry dealer, filed an action against its insuror, following a loss from burglary. Included in the lost property involved were certain items owned by the appellant W. Klang Son, Inc., a manufacturer and wholesaler of jewelry, which the record shows the latter had sold to the former on consignment. Intervention by the appellant would enable it to be apprised of proceedings in the action, and to timely and effectively assert its claim to any portion of the proceeds or payment resulting from the action to which it would become entitled in event it was found therein that the insurance covered the loss, including Klang's consigned property. As the owner-consignor of property for loss of which its consignee sought recovery from the insuror, Klang had an interest in the litigation sufficient to entitle it to intervene. See Morgareidge v. Howey, 75 Fla. 234, 78 So. 14, 15; Miracle House Corporation v. Haige, Fla., 96 So.2d 417.

The order appealed from is reversed.


Summaries of

W. Klang Son v. Milar Galleries

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 1, 1976
328 So. 2d 510 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

W. Klang Son v. Milar Galleries

Case Details

Full title:W. KLANG SON, INC., A CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. MILAR GALLERIES, INC.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 1, 1976

Citations

328 So. 2d 510 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing Cases

In re Rothstein, Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.

In short, Rigaud's interest did not derive from a legal right and was insufficient to warrant intervention…

Brickell Bay Condominium v. Forte

"(b) Any proceeds obtained as a result of such pending litigation will first be used to offset any claims…