From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

W. Jersey & S. S. R. Co. v. Cape May County

COURT OF CHANCERY OF NEW JERSEY
Jan 9, 1930
148 A. 401 (Ch. Div. 1930)

Opinion

01-09-1930

WEST JERSEY & S. S. R. CO. v. CAPE MAY COUNTY et al.

Bourgeois & Coulomb, of Atlantic City, for complainants. Palmer M. Way, of Wildwood, and French, Richards & Bradley, of Camden, for defendant County. Bolte, Tripician & Kirkman, of Atlantic City, for individual defendants.


Suit by the West Jersey & Seashore Railroad Company against Cape May County and others, in which certain defendants filed mechanics' lien claims. Claims allowed in part.

See, also, 100 N. J. Eq. 181, 135 A. 74.

Bourgeois & Coulomb, of Atlantic City, for complainants.

Palmer M. Way, of Wildwood, and French, Richards & Bradley, of Camden, for defendant County.

Bolte, Tripician & Kirkman, of Atlantic City, for individual defendants.

INGERSOLL, Vice Chancellor. The furnishing of instrumentalities to a contractor, and used by him in the performance of the contract, does not constitute labor within the terms of the Municipal Mechanics' Lien Law (1 Comp. St. Supp. 1924, pp. 1859-1864, §§ 126—51 to 126—69).

The only question remaining for determination is to ascertain the amount due, if any, to the several defendants.

(1) Joseph Camp. It will be noted that the answer filed by consent in this matter was not signed by the solicitor, nor is the mechanic's lien claim or affidavit thereto signed by anyone. It is needless, however, to consider any technical objection to this answer and claim, as the entire claim, with the exception of one item, is for the rental of a barge alleged to be used in this contract. The remaining item is for the value of a hawser which was upon the barge when rented, and which was not returned. These items cannot be allowed.

Delaware River Quarry & Construction Company v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Mercer, et al., 88 N. J. Eq. 506, 103 A. 18. "The furnishing of instrumentalities to a contractor and used by him in the performance of a contract, does not constitute

'labor'" within the terms of the Municipal Mechanics' Lien Law. Cramer v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Salem County et al. (N. J. Err. & App.) 147 A. 639.

(2) Ober and Woolson. This claim, amounting to $150.88, is for the value of labor furnished by them for the contractor, and will be allowed.

(3) Allen E. Grace. All of the items of Allen E. Grace's claim are for gasoline, oil, and containers used in the automobile and other motors and engines, and therefore cannot be allowed.

(4) Edgar F. Endicott. This claim must be reduced to $344.73, being the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth, and eleventh items on the bill. The items for team hire and for oil and gas must be excluded.

(5) George Frith. The first eight items must be excluded. The item of March 31st for little bridge tubes, 3 1/2 hours, must be excluded. The items of April 1st, 2d, 3d, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, and 10th must be excluded. Deducting these items, there remains the sum of $51.78.

The result therefore is that a decree will be made allowing the West Jersey & Seashore Railroad Company the sum heretofore determined.

Joseph Camp is allowed nothing.

Ober and Woolson are allowed $150.88.

Edgar F. Endicott is allowed $344.73.

George Frith is allowed $51.78.


Summaries of

W. Jersey & S. S. R. Co. v. Cape May County

COURT OF CHANCERY OF NEW JERSEY
Jan 9, 1930
148 A. 401 (Ch. Div. 1930)
Case details for

W. Jersey & S. S. R. Co. v. Cape May County

Case Details

Full title:WEST JERSEY & S. S. R. CO. v. CAPE MAY COUNTY et al.

Court:COURT OF CHANCERY OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Jan 9, 1930

Citations

148 A. 401 (Ch. Div. 1930)