Opinion
05-24-2017
W & H EQUITIES, LLC, respondent, v. Marvin ODUMS, appellant, et al., defendants.
Marvin Odums, Brooklyn, NY, appellant pro se. The Solferino Law Firm, P.C., Garden City, NY (Thomas P. Solferino of counsel), for respondent.
Marvin Odums, Brooklyn, NY, appellant pro se.
The Solferino Law Firm, P.C., Garden City, NY (Thomas P. Solferino of counsel), for respondent.
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Marvin Odums appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dabiri, J.), dated May 6, 2013, which denied his motion for recusal, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale dated August 2, 2011, and to set aside the foreclosure sale held pursuant thereto.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the appellant's motion which sought recusal, as the appellant failed to set forth any proof of bias or prejudice on the part of the court which would have warranted recusal (see Sassower v. Gannett Co., Inc., 109 A.D.3d 607, 609, 972 N.Y.S.2d 41 ; Daniels v. City of New York, 96 A.D.3d 895, 895, 946 N.Y.S.2d 510 ; see also Judiciary Law § 14 ).
Further, the appellant failed to establish any grounds for vacating the judgment of foreclosure and sale dated August 11, 2011, or to set aside the foreclosure sale held pursuant thereto (see W & H Equities LLC v. Odums, 113 A.D.3d 840, 978 N.Y.S.2d 910 ; see also CPLR 5015[a] ). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied those branches of the appellant's motion which were to vacate the judgment and sale.
The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.
MASTRO, J.P., CHAMBERS, ROMAN and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.