It seems odd that appellant, who has breached both contracts with appellee, and whose actions have caused appellee the additional expense of financing the construction of the home months past the construction note's projected payment date, now seeks to deny appellee his contractual remedy of specific performance because it would be "inequitable to her." As this Court stated in W.E.M., Inc. v. Weatherton, 447 S.W.2d 430, 435 (Tex.Civ.App. 1969, writ ref'd n.r.e.): Although courts of equity may decline to enforce those contracts which are inequitable or unfair, it is not their province to