W B Holdings, LLC v. PZA Props., LLC

Full title: W B Holdings, LLC, Respondent, v. PZA Properties, LLC, and Reidville…

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 20, 2012

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-367 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 20, 2012)

Opinion

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-367

06-20-2012

W B Holdings, LLC, Respondent, v. PZA Properties, LLC, and Reidville Development Associates, LLC, and Conrad C. Hurst, III, Defendants, Of whom Conrad C. Hurst, III is the Appellant.

Lawrence E. Flynn, Jr. and Elinor V. Lister, of Spartanburg, for Appellant. Timothy L. Cleveland, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD

NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY

PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge

AFFIRMED

Lawrence E. Flynn, Jr. and Elinor V. Lister, of Spartanburg, for Appellant.
Timothy L. Cleveland, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : Conrad C. Hurst, III appeals the denial of his motion for relief from default judgment, arguing the trial court erred in its determination that Hurst did not have justifications for not responding to W B Holdings's complaint in a timely manner. We affirm¹ pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: Rodriguez v. Gutierrez, 391 S.C. 323, 329, 705 S.E.2d 94, 98 (Ct. App. 2011) ("The decision whether to set aside an entry of default or a default judgment lies solely within the sound discretion of the [trial] court."); id. ("The [trial] court's decision will not be disturbed on appeal absent a clear showing of an abuse of that discretion.").

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

AFFIRMED.

PIEPER, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.