From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

W B Holdings, LLC v. PZA Properties, LLC

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jun 20, 2012
2012-UP-367 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 20, 2012)

Opinion

2012-UP-367

06-20-2012

W B Holdings, LLC, Respondent, v. PZA Properties, LLC, and Reidville Development Associates, LLC, and Conrad C. Hurst, III, Defendants, Of whom Conrad C. Hurst, III is the Appellant.

Lawrence E. Flynn, Jr. and Elinor V. Lister, of Spartanburg, for Appellant. Timothy L. Cleveland, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted June 1, 2012

Appeal From Spartanburg County J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge

Lawrence E. Flynn, Jr. and Elinor V. Lister, of Spartanburg, for Appellant.

Timothy L. Cleveland, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Conrad C. Hurst, III appeals the denial of his motion for relief from default judgment, arguing the trial court erred in its determination that Hurst did not have justifications for not responding to W B Holdings's complaint in a timely manner. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: Rodriguez v. Gutierrez, 391 S.C. 323, 329, 705 S.E.2d 94, 98 (Ct. App. 2011) ("The decision whether to set aside an entry of default or a default judgment lies solely within the sound discretion of the [trial] court."); id. ("The [trial] court's decision will not be disturbed on appeal absent a clear showing of an abuse of that discretion.").

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

AFFIRMED.

PIEPER, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

W B Holdings, LLC v. PZA Properties, LLC

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jun 20, 2012
2012-UP-367 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 20, 2012)
Case details for

W B Holdings, LLC v. PZA Properties, LLC

Case Details

Full title:W B Holdings, LLC, Respondent, v. PZA Properties, LLC, and Reidville…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jun 20, 2012

Citations

2012-UP-367 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 20, 2012)