From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vulles v. Thies & Talle Mgmt.

Supreme Court of Montana
Nov 2, 2021
DA 21-0141 (Mont. Nov. 2, 2021)

Opinion

DA 21-0141

11-02-2021

SAMANTHA VULLES, SHEW ESTENSON, et al. Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. THIES & TALLE MANAGEMENT, INC., THIES & TALLE ENTERPRISES, INC., ALMANOR INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and JOHN DOES 1-4, Defendants and Appellees.


ORDER

Appellees have filed a motion to strike the affidavit of Patience Woodill and related exhibits attached to Appellants' reply brief filed on September 29, 2021. Appellees support their motion by arguing that Appellants cannot introduce new evidence to supplement the record for the first time on appeal. They further contend that the affidavit is inadmissible hearsay under M. R. Evid. 801 and 802, Appellants oppose the motion and respond that Appellees accused them of "forum-shopping" in their response brief: therefore, Woodill's affidavit and related exhibits are the "only course of action to refute those unsubstantiated claims."

We conclude it is appropriate to take the motion to strike under advisement and consider it in conjunction with consideration of the merits of the appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to strike the affidavit of Patience Woodill and related exhibits, attached to Appellants' reply brief, as well as all references thereto, is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT.

The Clerk of the Supreme Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record. 1


Summaries of

Vulles v. Thies & Talle Mgmt.

Supreme Court of Montana
Nov 2, 2021
DA 21-0141 (Mont. Nov. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Vulles v. Thies & Talle Mgmt.

Case Details

Full title:SAMANTHA VULLES, SHEW ESTENSON, et al. Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. THIES…

Court:Supreme Court of Montana

Date published: Nov 2, 2021

Citations

DA 21-0141 (Mont. Nov. 2, 2021)