From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

VU v. CITY OF PORTLAND

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Sep 5, 2006
Civil No. 06-15-HU (D. Or. Sep. 5, 2006)

Opinion

Civil No. 06-15-HU.

September 5, 2006

Nikola Lyn Jones, James P. McCurdy, Lindsay, Hart, Neil Weigler, Portland, Oregon, Attorneys for Plaintiff.

J. Scott Moede, Deputy City Attorney, Office of City Attorney, Portland, Oregon, Attorney for Defendants.


ORDER


The Honorable Dennis Hubel, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on August 14, 2006. The matter is before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2nd 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983); See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Hubel's Findings and Recommendation (#26).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (#22) is denied.


Summaries of

VU v. CITY OF PORTLAND

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Sep 5, 2006
Civil No. 06-15-HU (D. Or. Sep. 5, 2006)
Case details for

VU v. CITY OF PORTLAND

Case Details

Full title:THUAN VU, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PORTLAND; SGT. STEVEN J. LARSEN…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Sep 5, 2006

Citations

Civil No. 06-15-HU (D. Or. Sep. 5, 2006)