From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vreeland v. Suthers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 9, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01921-PAB-KMT (D. Colo. May. 9, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01921-PAB-KMT

05-09-2013

DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II, Plaintiff, v. JOHN W. SUTHERS, Attorney General, TOM CLEMENTS, Executive Director of the CDOC, and SERGEANT GRIGGS, CDOC/BVCF Mailroom, Defendants.


Judge Philip A. Brimmer


ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Complaint against Defendant John W. Suthers [Docket No. 56]. The Court has reviewed the pleading and is fully advised in the premises. It is

ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss Complaint against Defendant John W. Suthers [Docket No. 56] is GRANTED. It is further

ORDERED that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), all claims against defendant John W. Suthers, Attorney General, are dismissed without prejudice, with each party to bear his own attorneys' fees and costs.

BY THE COURT:

____________

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Vreeland v. Suthers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 9, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01921-PAB-KMT (D. Colo. May. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Vreeland v. Suthers

Case Details

Full title:DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II, Plaintiff, v. JOHN W. SUTHERS, Attorney…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: May 9, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01921-PAB-KMT (D. Colo. May. 9, 2013)