From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Voyles v. Commissioner of Social Security Admin

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Mar 4, 2011
No. 3:10-CV-0652-B (N.D. Tex. Mar. 4, 2011)

Summary

In Voyles, it was not clear whether "moderate limitations in her ability to maintain concentration, persistence, or pace" were adequately encompassed simply by asking the VE whether jobs he had identified in response to a posed hypothetical which did not include the limitation were "fairly simple, routine, [and] repetitive or involv[ed] simple, routine, repetitive type tasks."

Summary of this case from Downing v. Astrue

Opinion

No. 3:10-CV-0652-B.

March 4, 2011


ORDER


After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, I am of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted.

SIGNED this 4th day of March, 2011.


Summaries of

Voyles v. Commissioner of Social Security Admin

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Mar 4, 2011
No. 3:10-CV-0652-B (N.D. Tex. Mar. 4, 2011)

In Voyles, it was not clear whether "moderate limitations in her ability to maintain concentration, persistence, or pace" were adequately encompassed simply by asking the VE whether jobs he had identified in response to a posed hypothetical which did not include the limitation were "fairly simple, routine, [and] repetitive or involv[ed] simple, routine, repetitive type tasks."

Summary of this case from Downing v. Astrue
Case details for

Voyles v. Commissioner of Social Security Admin

Case Details

Full title:JENNIFER M. VOYLES, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Mar 4, 2011

Citations

No. 3:10-CV-0652-B (N.D. Tex. Mar. 4, 2011)

Citing Cases

G.K.C. v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

Plaintiff also complains that the RFC found by the ALJ did not adequately account for the moderate limitation…

Downing v. Astrue

Consequently, while plaintiff is correct that the ALJ did not include, in his RFC, the specific words…