Vowell v. Neer

1 Citing case

  1. Gibson v. Brasher

    50 So. 2d 59 (La. Ct. App. 1951)   Cited 2 times

    In view of this fact defendant's contention that he thought rental regulations were no longer in effect, particularly when he offered no support of the basis for such speculation, is particularly inappropriate and unacceptable. We have carefully considered the cases cited by the District Judge in support of his opinion, Hecht Co. v. Bowles, 321 U.S. 321, 64 S.Ct. 587, 88 L.Ed. 754, and Vowell v. Neer, D.C., 82 F. Supp. 936, 938. We do not perceive that the former case has any application to the facts presented here, since it involved an action by the Administrator seeking an injunction, and the court concerned itself entirely with a consideration as to (1) discretion of a court in the granting vel non of an injunction; (2) the effect of cessation of violations as influencing the issuance of an injunction, and (3) the propriety and necessity for injunctive relief with reference to matters of public interest.