From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vought v. Rowland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 3, 1941
261 App. Div. 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Opinion

March 3, 1941.


Order denying appellants' motion for an order of interpleader substituting Jacob Gralla, a claimant, as the defendant in this action to recover brokerage commissions, and to direct the defendants to pay into court the sum of $875 and, upon making such payment, to discharge them from liability to any claimant, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs. We are of opinion that this is a proper case for interpleader. ( Williamsburgh Savings Bank v. Avery, 260 App. Div. 1047; Pell Tibbits, Inc., v. Bedford, 238 id. 856; Dardonville v. Smith, 133 id. 234; Crane v. McDonald, 118 N.Y. 648.) Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P.J., concurs on authority of Williamsburgh Savings Bank v. Avery ( supra), but adheres to the views expressed in his dissenting memorandum in that case.


Summaries of

Vought v. Rowland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 3, 1941
261 App. Div. 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)
Case details for

Vought v. Rowland

Case Details

Full title:VOUGHT, CAMPBELL, WARD CO., INC., and Others, Respondents, v. ESTHER L…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 3, 1941

Citations

261 App. Div. 971 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Citing Cases

Fanslow v. Manufacturers Trust Co.

Both actions should be consolidated and tried together. ( Williamsburgh Sav. Bank v. Avery, 260 A.D. 104 7;…