Votino v. Jacquez

Full title: LOUIS VOTINO, Petitioner, v. FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 9, 2012

2:10-cv-1784 MCE JFM P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2012)

Opinion

LOUIS VOTINO, Petitioner, v. FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, Respondent. No. 2:10-cv-1784 MCE JFM P United States District Court, E.D. California. July 9, 2012

          ORDER

          MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., District Judge.

         Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

         On May 25, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein (ECF No. 20) which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

         The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The findings and recommendations filed May 25, 2012, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

         2. Petitioner's motion to lift the stay is GRANTED and this matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.