From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Votino v. Jacquez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 18, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-1784 MCE-JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-1784 MCE-JFM (HC)

04-18-2012

LOUIS VOTINO, Petitioner, v. FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. By order filed October 19, 2010, this matter was stayed pending exhaustion of state remedies as to petitioner's claim of newly discovered evidence of actual innocence and petitioner was directed to file a motion to lift the stay within thirty days from the date of any order by the California Supreme Court resolving that claim. On March 28, 2012, petitioner filed a first amended petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The first amended petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by petitioner on March 28, 2012 is construed as including a motion to lift the stay of this action;

2. Within fifteen days from the date of this order respondent shall file and serve a response to said motion; and

3. Petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and served not later than ten days thereafter.

________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Votino v. Jacquez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 18, 2012
No. 2:10-cv-1784 MCE-JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Votino v. Jacquez

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS VOTINO, Petitioner, v. FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 18, 2012

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-1784 MCE-JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2012)