From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vossler v. Amin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1991
175 A.D.2d 570 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

July 12, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Allegany County, Gossel, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Doerr, Lawton, Lowery and Davis, JJ.


Order modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to defendants Amin and Cuba Memorial Hospital, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendants Amin and Cuba Memorial Hospital (Hospital) summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs' complaint. Plaintiff Leo Vossler alleges that he suffered physical and psychic injury as a result of a two-month delay in diagnosis of his lung cancer. Defendants established by competent medical proof that plaintiff Leo Vossler had suffered no injury caused by the purported delay. Plaintiffs failed to offer any competent medical proof demonstrating that plaintiff Leo Vossler's medical condition had been adversely affected by any delay in diagnosis and treatment. Thus, defendants' contention that plaintiff Leo Vossler did not suffer a physical injury must be resolved, as a matter of law, in their favor (see also, Dodes v North Shore Univ. Hosp., 149 A.D.2d 455; Hryniak v Littauer Hosp. Assn., 86 A.D.2d 699). In addition, plaintiff Leo Vossler's assertion of psychic injury, without any claim of physical injury, does not, in the circumstances of this case, state a cognizable cause of action (see, Lancellotti v Howard, 155 A.D.2d 588; Green v Leibowitz, 118 A.D.2d 756). Finally, because defendants are not liable to plaintiff Leo Vossler, plaintiff Mary Ann Vossler's derivative cause of action also must be dismissed (see, Allen v County of Westchester, 172 A.D.2d 471; Siskind v Norris, 152 A.D.2d 196, 198, lv dismissed 76 N.Y.2d 772; see also, Liff v Schildkrout, 49 N.Y.2d 622). Accordingly, the order of Supreme Court is modified to dismiss the complaint against defendants Amin and the Hospital, and, as modified, is affirmed.

All concur, except Dillon, P.J., who dissents in part and votes to affirm for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Gossel, J.


Summaries of

Vossler v. Amin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1991
175 A.D.2d 570 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Vossler v. Amin

Case Details

Full title:LEO VOSSLER et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. D.S. AMIN et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1991

Citations

175 A.D.2d 570 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
572 N.Y.S.2d 238

Citing Cases

Tischler v. Dimenna

Similar judicial reluctance appears in other fear or phobia claim cases. (Creed v United Hosp., 190 A.D.2d…

Thomas v. Supermarkets General Corp.

ancellotti v Howard, 155 A.D.2d 588, 589-590 [2d Dept 1989]; Battalla v State of New York, 10 N.Y.2d 237). As…