From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Voshell v. Windish

Supreme Court of Delaware
Jul 19, 1982
449 A.2d 209 (Del. 1982)

Opinion

Submitted June 16, 1982.

Decided July 19, 1982.

Upon appeal from the Court of Chancery. Affirmed.

James J. Hanley (Argued), Deputy Atty. Gen., Wilmington, for appellants.

Jeffrey M. Weiner (Argued), of Bayard, Brill Handelman, P. A., Wilmington, for appellee.

Before McNEILLY, QUILLEN and HORSEY, JJ.


In this case we are called upon to review the power of the Department of Public Safety (Department) to revoke under 21 Del. C. § 2732(a)(8) the license or driving privileges of a person tried and convicted in the Alderman's Court of the City of Newark for violation of Municipal Ordinance 20-12(b). We are satisfied that the Department may not.

21 Del. C. § 2732(a)(8) provides:

"(a) The Department shall forthwith revoke the license or driving privileges or both of any person upon receiving a record of the conviction of such a person of any of the following crimes:
* * * * * *
(8) A conviction of attempting to flee or elude a police officer after having received a visual or audible signal from him as provided in § 4103(b) of this title." Id. (emphasis added).

Section 20-12(b) of the Code of the City of Newark provides:

"(b) Any driver who, having received a visual or audible signal from a police motor vehicle or by a clearly discernable police signal to bring his vehicle to a stop, operates his vehicle in disregard of the signal or interferes with or endangers the operation of the police vehicle or who increases his speed or extinguishes his lights and attempts to flee or elude the police officer, shall be fined for the first offense, not less than five hundred dollars ($500.00) or more than two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) or imprisoned for not less than sixty (60) days nor more than six (6) months, or both. For each subsequent like offense he shall be fined not less than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) nor more than three thousand dollars ($3,000.00) and imprisoned not less than sixty (60) days nor more than eighteen (18) months." Id.

Mark T. Windish (Windish) was tried and convicted by the Newark City Alderman for failure to stop at the command of a police officer under City Ordinance § 20-12(b). In accordance with the requirements of 21 Del. C. § 703(e)(1), the Newark Alderman's Court notified the Department of Windish's conviction. Upon receipt of the notification, the Department notified Windish that his driving privileges had been revoked for a period of one year pursuant to the provisions of 21 Del. C. § 2732(a)(8). Thereupon Windish successfully sought injunctive relief in the Court of Chancery. The Department appeals and argues that since 21 Del. C. § 703(e)(1) requires the Alderman's Court to report all convictions and dispositions of moving traffic violations to the State Division of Motor Vehicles, and since 21 Del. C. § 4103(b) permits the Department to revoke the driving privileges of persons convicted of failing to stop at the command of a police officer, the Department has the power of revocation for the Municipal Ordinance violation, which is silent as to the possibility of revocation.

21 Del. C. § 703(e)(1) reads:

"(1) All convictions in said alderman's Court or mayor's Court for moving traffic violations and the disposition of those cases shall become a matter of record to be filed with the State Division of Motor Vehicles. Records of all such convictions shall be forwarded to the Division no later than 10 days after disposition of the case." Id.

The first sentence of 21 Del. C. § 4103(b) reads exactly as the first sentence of the City of Newark Ordinance § 20-12(b). The second sentence continues:

"Upon receiving notice of such conviction the Secretary, at his discretion, may forthwith revoke the operator's or chauffer's license of the person so convicted for a period of 2 years." Id. § 4103(b).

We find it unnecessary to reach other issues which may lurk in the wings of this case since we are satisfied that 21 Del. C. § 2732(a)(8), upon which the Department claims its power to revoke in this case rests, clearly limits the power of revocation thereunder to convictions under state law 21 Del. C. § 4103(b)). Had the General Assembly intended otherwise it would have so provided.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Voshell v. Windish

Supreme Court of Delaware
Jul 19, 1982
449 A.2d 209 (Del. 1982)
Case details for

Voshell v. Windish

Case Details

Full title:Robert J. VOSHELL, and the State of Delaware, Division of Motor Vehicles…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Jul 19, 1982

Citations

449 A.2d 209 (Del. 1982)