From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

VORE v. U.S. BANK

Court of Appeals of Kansas
Feb 20, 2004
32 Kan. App. 2 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004)

Summary

In Vore v. U.S. Bank, 84 P.3d 636 (Table)(Kan.App. 2004), the Court found that the term "reasonably ascertainable" carried with it an obligation to investigate available factual resources.

Summary of this case from Leathers v. Leathers

Opinion

No. 90,734.

February 20, 2004.

Appeal from the Johnson.


Unpublished Opinions Affirmed.


Summaries of

VORE v. U.S. BANK

Court of Appeals of Kansas
Feb 20, 2004
32 Kan. App. 2 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004)

In Vore v. U.S. Bank, 84 P.3d 636 (Table)(Kan.App. 2004), the Court found that the term "reasonably ascertainable" carried with it an obligation to investigate available factual resources.

Summary of this case from Leathers v. Leathers
Case details for

VORE v. U.S. BANK

Case Details

Full title:Vore v. U.S. Bank, N.A

Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas

Date published: Feb 20, 2004

Citations

32 Kan. App. 2 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

Leathers v. Leathers

An injury is reasonably ascertainable when a party knew or could reasonably have been expected to know of the…