From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vonier v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 8, 1996
673 So. 2d 129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-0411.

May 8, 1996.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Charles Smith, Judge. L.T. Case No. 94-728.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Karen E. Ehrlich, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ettie Feistmann, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


The judgment entered in this case reflects that appellant entered a plea to and was adjudicated guilty of loitering and prowling. That crime was not charged in the information, nor did appellant enter a plea to it. This case is remanded to the trial court for entry of an amended judgment containing only the first four crimes listed in the judgment.

The remaining issue on appeal concerns the failure of the trial court to orally pronounce two conditions of probation at the sentencing hearing. These conditions are among the eleven general conditions set forth in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.986 (e), so they need not have been specifically pronounced at sentencing. State v. Hart, 668 So.2d 589 (Fla. 1996).

STONE, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vonier v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 8, 1996
673 So. 2d 129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Vonier v. State

Case Details

Full title:LARRY VONIER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 8, 1996

Citations

673 So. 2d 129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)