Opinion
No. 2013AP624.
2014-04-29
In re the Marriage of: Margaret C. VONFRICK, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Robert H. VONFRICK, Respondent–Appellant.
Upon concluding his scope-of-review argument, Robert transitions to his arguments that the court erroneously denied his motion for reconsideration. Robert does not, however, assert, much less explain how, any of the individual arguments concern new issues that could not have been raised in a direct appeal from the divorce judgment. Rather, he merely argues the court erred in each instance by failing to remedy the errors it made in the original divorce judgment.